Linguistic features of the official speeches of President V.V. Putin (on the example of the inaugural speech genre
Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics
Aktualnye problemi filologii i pedagogicheskoi lingvistiki
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF LINGUISTICS
ISSN 2079-6021(Print)
ISBN 2619-029X(Online)

Linguistic features of the official speeches of President V.V. Putin (on the example of the inaugural speech genre


DOI: https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2020-3-45-54

Linguistic features of the official speeches of President V.V. Putin (on the example of the inaugural speech genre


Szymula Robert /


Abstract: The purpose of this study was to analyze the linguistic features of the genre of the inaugural speech of the President of Russia. The last inaugural speech delivered by V.V. Putin on May 7, 2018. was the lexical material for the study. The descriptive method and the contextual method were used during the analysis. The speech of the incoming President, although relatively new for Russian reality, is an important genre of modern political discourse. Inaugural speeches belong to ritual genres. The tradition of this discursive type originated in the United States. The inaugural speech fulfills the function of consolidating listeners as a people, with its help the new President presents his political credo and defines the principles that will guide him in the future. The article examines the structure of speech, the functions it performs, the characteristic concepts verbalized in it. The analyzed performance has a structure typical for this genre, borrowed from the American tradition (greeting, introduction, main part and conclusion). It implements all the main functions of this discursive genre (integrative, inspirational, declarative and performative) with the help of characteristic topos (topos of inauguration, topos of law-abidingness, topos of a worthy leader, topos of duty, topos of work, topos of reliance on the past, topos of renewal, topos of greatness of the nation, topos of mutual obligations, topos of the unity of the nation). The study shows that lexical units are used by the speaker in such a way as to focus the attention of listeners on the positive, not negative, aspects of reality (a good situation in the country, a bright future for the state, the President as a reliable leader), which is a characteristic feature of this genre of political discourse. The overall positive impression shifts the listeners’ attention to other components of the utterance. The concepts typical for this genre are the concepts of “power” and “unity”. The study showed that the concept of “unity” is verbalized in the speech of V.V. Putin with the help of numerous lexical units, but the concept of “power” is realized more indirectly than directly, and it is not the president’s power that is emphasized, but his duties and responsibilities.

Keywords: discourse, political discourse, V.V. Putin, presidential discourse, inaugural speech, functions of inaugural speech, toposes

For citation: Szymula R. Linguistic features of the official speeches of President V.V. Putin (on the example of the inaugural speech genre). Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics. 2020, no 3, pp. 45–54 (In Russ.)

Bionote:
Robert Szymula, Doctor of Philology, lecturer, University of Bialystok, Department of East Slavonic Linguistics and Regional Onomastics; Bialystok, Poland. 
E-mail: rszymula@interia.pl
Address: 15-420, Bialystok, Plac Niezależnego Zrzeszenia Studentów 1. Faculty of Philology. University of Białystok

Download issue

References:
1. Sheygal ЕI. Semiotics of political discourse. Volgograd: Peremena; 2000. (In Russ.).
2. Tamzina AT. Problems of modern American presidential rhetoric. Abakan: Publishing House of the Khakass State University named after N.F. Katanov; 2001. (In Russ.).
3. Gavrilova MV. Cognitive and rhetorical bases of the presidential speech. St. Petersburg: Philological Faculty of St. Petersburg State University; 2013. (In Russ.).
4. Pocheptsov GG. Communication theory and practice (From presidential speeches to negotiations with terrorists). Мoscow: Centr; 1998. (In Russ.).
5. Campbell KK., Jamieson KH. Inaugurating the Presidency. Form, Genre and the Study of Political Discourse. Columbia (S. Car.): University of South Carolina Press; 1986:203-225.
6. Budaev EV. Political metaphorology: perspectives of comparative analysis. Political linguistics. Yekaterinburg: UrGPU; 2010;1(31):9-23. (In Russ.).
7. Chudinov AP. Political linguistics: textbook. Moscow: Flinta, Science; 2006. (In Russ.).
8. Parshin PB. Research practices, subject matter and methods of political linguistics. In Scripta linguisticae applicatae. Problems of Applied Linguistics. Мoscow: Azbukovnik; 2001:181-208. (In Russ.).
9. Yerilova SL. Metaphor as a mean of expressing semantic uncertainty in political discourse. Language subsystems: stability and dynamics. Tver’: Publishing house of TvGU; 2002:67-78. (In Russ.).
10. Bazylev VN. Towards the study of political discourse in Russia and Russian political discourse. Political discourse in Russia – 2: Proceedings of a workshop (Moscow, March 29, 1998). Мoscow: Dialog-МGU; 1998:6-8. (In Russ.).
11. Tsygankov AP. The Frustrating Partnership: Honor, Status, and Emotions in Russia’s Discourses of the West. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 2014;47(3):345-354. (In Eng.).
12. Dem’yankov VZ. Interpretation of political discourse in the media. The language of the media as an object of interdisciplinary research: a textbook. Resp. ed. M.N. Volodina. Мoscow: Publishing house of the Lomonosov Moscow State University; 2003:116-133. (In Russ.).
13. Gornostaeva A. Ironic metaphors in political discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 2018;22(1):108-125. 
14. Weiss D. Analogical reasoning with quotations? A spotlight on Russian parliamentary discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 2020;155:101-110. (In Eng.).
15. Gimranova TA., Kolosova EI., Sokolova A., Mengyi L. Antithesis as Leverage in Russian Political Discourse. Journal of research in applied linguistics, 2019;10(SP):605-611. (In Eng.).
16. Karaliova T. Let Them Talk: New Year’s Presidential Rhetoric in Russia, Belarus, and Poland. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 2015;40(2):145-161.
17. Rak J., Bäcker R. Theory behind Russian Quest for Totalitarianism. Analysis of Discursive Swing in Putin’s Speeches. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 2020;53(1):13-26. (In Eng.).
18. Pavković A. Sacralisation of contested territory in nationalist discourse: a study of Milošević’s and Putin’s public speeches. Critical Discourse Studies, 2017;14(5):497-513.
19. Koteyko N., Ryazanova-Clarke L. The Path and Building Metaphors in the Speeches of Vladimir Putin: Back to the Future? Slavonica, 2013;15(2):112-127. (In Eng.).
20. Tameryan TY., Zheltukhina MR., Slyshkin GG., Zelenskaya LL., Ryabko OP., Bodony MA. Political Media Communication: Bilingual Strategies in the Pre-Election Campaign Speeches. ONLINE J COMMUN MEDI. 2019;9(4):e201921. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/5869. (In Eng.).
21. Official site of the President of the Russian Federation. Available at: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/57416. Accessed June 29, 2020. (In Russ.).
22. Large explanatory dictionary of the Russian language. Ch. ed. S.A. Kuznetsov. St. Petersburg: Norint; 1998. (In Russ.).
23. Shansky N.M., Bobrova T.A. School etymological dictionary of the Russian language. The origin of words. Moscow: Drofa; 2002. (In Russ.)


Количество показов: 280

Возврат к списку

ISSN 2079-6021 (Print)
ISBN 2619-029X (Online)