Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics
Aktualnye problemi filologii i pedagogicheskoi lingvistiki
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF LINGUISTICS
ISSN 2079-6021(Print)
ISBN 2619-029X(Online)

Syncretism of the New Year’s Greetings Genre: Bilingual Ranking and Strategic Intentions


DOI: https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2020-4-32-43

Syncretism of the New Year’s Greetings Genre: Bilingual Ranking and Strategic Intentions


Tameryan Tatiana Yu. / Rakhmatulaeva Tatyana G. /


Abstract: The article covers issues related to the New Year’s addresses of Vyacheslav Zelimkhanovich Bitarov, the head of the Republic of North Ossetia-Alania, and the Anatoly Ilyich Bibilov, President of the Republic of South Ossetia. as the specifics of political communication small form genre. The genre features and cultural and historical characteristics of the New Year’s address of the head of state are identified and described. The study is based on the methodological platforms of genre analysis, approaches to typologization of speech genres, methods of communication strategies analyzing, methods and techniques of cognitive analysis, methods of conceptological analysis, methods of contextual analysis. The authors identified the typologically inherent characteristics in this political discourse genre based on the multidimensional classification criteria. A detailed analysis of the structural and semantic organization of the New Year address has been carried out. Variants of language codes switching are revealed, namely parity messages duplication, summarization in the Ossetian language, circular bilingual representation of the text. An optical mode of ritual appeal, represented by prayer formulas, has been determined. The types of performativity realized through etiquette congratulations and generally accepted wishes, ethnic well-wishes and clichéd fragments of Ossetian toast-prayers are considered. . The basic concepts of the of New Year’s messages cognitive space are described, including ethnospecific Ossetian concepts «куывд»”(kuyvd”), «фарн» (“farn), «бæркад» (“bаrkad”) and universal concepts “values”, “past”, “future”, “achievements”. The originality of the appeal texts targeting is indicated, it consists in the native land – Ossetia (Iriston) personification and the ethnos differentiation into the North and South Ossetians. According to the study results, it was established that the congratulation texts of the North and South Ossetias leaders are generated on the basis of a stable model, which possesses the genre in political discourse institutional features and ethnic features of traditional Ossetian communication.

The reported study was funded by RFBR
and MES RSO according to the research project № 19-512-07002 (10-МК/19).

Keywords: political discourse, genre, New Year’s greetings, Ossetian-Russian bilingualism, text structure, ethnic characteristics

For citation: Tameryan T.Yu., Rakhmatulaeva T.G. Syncretism of the New Year’s Greetings Genre: Bilingual Ranking and Strategic Intentions. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics. 2020, no 4, pp. 32–43 (In Russ.)

Bionote:
Tatyana Yu. Tameryan
North Ossetian State University
(Russian Federation, Vladikavkaz)
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-0532-2538;
Researcher ID: L-1756-2018;
Author ID: 57110384400;
e-mail: tamertu@mail.ru

Tatyana G. Rakhmatulaeva
North Ossetian State University
(Russian Federation, Vladikavkaz)
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-4678-9708;
e-mail: t.rach@yandex.ru

Download issue

References:
1. Levinson S. Activity types and language. Linguistics. 1979;17:356-399. 
2. Girnth H. Texte in politischen Diskurs. Ein Vorschlag zu diskursorientierten Beschreibung von Textsorten. Muttersprache. 1996:66-80. 
3. Demyankov VZ. Political discourse as a subject of political science philology. Political Science. Political discourse: history and modern research. Moscow: INION RAN, 2002;3:32–43.
4. Sheigal EI. Semiotics of political discourse. Moscow: Gnosis, 2004. 
5. Chudinov AP. Political communication. Moscow: Flinta-Science, 2006.
6. Fairclough N. Genres in political discourse. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier, 2005:33. 
7. Budaev EV. Political linguistics. 2010;1(31):153-158. 
8. Kozhukhova VV. Specificity and genre space of political discourse. ISTU Bulletin. 2012;8(67). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/spetsifika-i-zhanrovoe-prostranstvo-politicheskogo-diskursa. Accessed December 05, 2020. 
9. Nurseitova Kh., Zharkynbekova Sh., Bokayev B., Bokayeva A. Language and Gender in Political Discourse (Mass Media Interviews). Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013;70:417-422. 
10. Aleshina EYu. Genre gradation of political discourse. Russian humanitarian journal. 2016;3. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zhanrovaya-gradatsiya-politicheskogo-diskursa. Accessed December 05, 2020.
11. Romanenko AV. Genre characteristics of political discourse. Human capital. 2017;7(103):92-96. 
12. Sukhanov YuYu. Political discourse as an object of linguistic analysis. RUDN Bulletin. Series: Theory of language. Semiotics. Semantics. 2018;1(9):200-212. 
13. Dyck TA. Language. Cognition. Communication: collection of works. Moscow: Progress, 1989.
14. Wodak R. The Discourse of Politics in Action. Politics as Usual (2nd revised ed. Zjupress, 2020. 
15. Haselow A. Expressing stance in spoken political discourse — The function of parenthetical inserts. Language Sciences. 2020;82:101334, https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.langsci.2020.101334. 
16. Aunphattanasilp Ch. Civil society coalitions, power relations, and socio-political ideas: Discourse creation and redesigning energy policies and actor networks in Thailand. Energy Research & Social Science. 2019;58:101271, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101271
17. Kranert M., Benjamins J. Discourse and Political Culture. The language of the Third Way in Germany and the UK. Amsterdam. Philadelphia, 2019:298. 
18. Nurseitova Kh., Zharkynbekova Sh., Bokayev B., Bokayeva A. Language and Gender in Political Discourse (Mass Media Interviews). Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013;70:417-422, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro. 2013.01.079. 
19. Ussama Yaqub, Soon Ae Chun, Vijayalakshmi Atluri, Jaideep Vaidya. Analysis of political discourse on twitter in the context of the 2016 US presidential elections. Government Information Quarterly. 2017;34(4):613-626, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.001.
20. Dilin Liu, Lei Lei. The appeal to political sentiment: An analysis of Donald Trump’s and Hillary Clinton’s speech themes and discourse strategies in the 2016 US presidential election. Discourse, Context & Media. 2018;25:143, https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.05.001. 
21. Christmas and New Year messages from leaders of different countries. TASS. Available at: https://tass.ru/politika/1667395. Accessed December 01, 2015.
22. The history of New Year’s addresses of the leaders of the USSR and Russia. TASS. Available at: https://tass.ru/info/4853807. Accessed December 31, 2017.
 23. Oslopova VYu. New Year’s address of the head of state to the people as a genre of political discourse. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. 2009;329:19-22. 
24. Varavkina VYu. New Year’s address of the head of state: genre specificity and linguo-cognitive modeling of the addressee’s image. Dis. ... Cand. philological sciences. Omsk, 2011. 
25. Mitsuk TI. New Year’s address of the President of Russia as a text of political communication. XVIII International Conference “Culture, Personality, Society in the Modern World: Methodology, Experience of Empirical Research”. Ekaterinburg: UrFU, 2015:1625-1630. 
26. Sladkevich ZhR. Organization of a semiotic space for New Year greetings. Political Science. 2016;3:168-194. 
27. Qin Panpan. New Year’s greetings addressed by the head of the region to residents as a genre of Russian and Chinese political discourse. Political linguistics. 2019;4(76);154-164. 
28. Babaytseva VV. Transitional constructions in syntax: Monograph. Voronezh: Center. Chernozem. book publishing house, 1967. 
29. Vysotskaya IV. Syncretism in the system of parts of speech of the modern Russian language: Monograph. Moscow: MGPU, 2006. 
30. Gudkov DB. Rituals and precedents in political discourse. Political discourse in Russia. Materials slave. meetings. Moscow: Dialogue-MGU, 1998:30-36. 
31. Karasik VI. Ritual discourse. Genres of speech. Saratov: Publishing house of GosUNTs “College”, 2002;3:157-171. 
 32. Tameryan TYu., Zheltukhina MR., Slyshkin GG., Shevchenko AV., Katermina VV., Sausheva YV. New country’s political discourse: formation of speech technologies. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods. 2018;8(8):11-18.
33. Tameryan TY., Zheltukhina MR., Slyshkin GG., Zelenskaya LL., Ryabko OP., Bodony MA. Political Media Communication: Bilingual Strategies in the Pre-Election Campaign Speeches. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies. 2019;9(4):e201921, https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/5869
34. Chudinov AP. Discursive characteristics of political communication. Political linguistics. 2012;2(40):53-59. 
35. New Year’s greetings from the Head of the Republic of North Ossetia-Alania V.Z. Bitarov with 2018. Republic of North Ossetia - Alania. Official portal. Available at: http://alania.gov.ru/news/5409. Accessed December 31, 2018.
36. New Year’s greetings from the Head of the Republic of North Ossetia-Alania Vyacheslav Bitarov. Ossetia-Iriston. Available at: https://iryston.tv/teleproject_ release/novogodnee-pozdravlenie-glavy-respubliki-severnaya-osetiya-alaniya-vyacheslava-bitarova/. Accessed December 31, 2018.
37. New Year’s address of the President of the Republic of South Ossetia Anatoly Bibilov. New Year’s greetings from the president: the 20s of the XXI century should be breakthrough for South Ossetia. State Information Agency “Res”. Available at: http: //cominf.org/node/1166527392. Accessed December 31, 2019.
38. Guriev TA. Ossetian-Russian Dictionary. Vladikavkaz: SOIGSI, 1993:384. 
39. Abaev VI. Historical and etymological dictionary. L.: Nauka, 1989;4:925.


Количество показов: 1028

Возврат к списку

ISSN 2079-6021 (Print)
ISBN 2619-029X (Online)