Abstract:
The article is focused on the analysis of structural-semantic features of buzzwords and relating to them problem of interlingual lacunarity in two kinds of professional discourse – business and political-legal discourse. Buzzwords are understood as a special category of lexical units which emerge die to the need of nominating new culture-specific elements, tendencies and trends, as well as attaching novelty to existing in the language phenomena. The study relevance is stipulated by the common understanding that buzzwords represent the newest layer of modern English vocabulary reflecting the most recent changes currently happening in the English language under the influence of modern socio-political processes. The authors draw attention to a close relation between buzzwords and interlingual lacunarity as buzzwords do not have laconic variants of translation, thus demanding the use of various techniques of direct translation such as borrowing, calque and literal translation. Special emphasis is put on some word formation models, according to which many buzzwords are formed. Such word formation methods include affixation, abbreviation, blending and metaphoric transfer. Having considered the results of the research, the authors come to conclusion that different word formation models prevail in different kinds of discourse, as well as different direct translation techniques can be applied to translate them from English into Russian. For political-legal discourse more widespread word formation models include affixation, abbreviation and metaphoric transfer, whereas in business discourse, alongside with abbreviation, blending is also widely used. The most common translation technique is literal translation, sometimes together with other methods. For instance, while translating buzzwords belonging to political-legal sphere, in particular, those formed by affixation using the suffix -ism and the prefix post-, it is possible to provide borrowing as the translation of the new word. Nevertheless, further such borrowed lexical unit will demand additional explanation which is usually represented by the literal translation of its definition. Lack of equivalents of buzzwords in lexicographic sources in Russian proves the fact that they belong to the category of interlingual lexical gaps.
Keywords: buzzword, business discourse, direct translation techniques, lexical gap, interlingual lacunarity, political-legal discourse, professional discourse, word formation models
For citation: Litvishko O.M., Chernousova Y.A., Natkho O.I. Buzzwords as the example of interlingual lacunarity in various kinds of professional discourse (based on the English language material). Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics. 2020, no 4, pp. 104–115 (In Russ.)
Bionote:
Olga M. Litvishko
Pyatigorsk State University
(Russian Federation, Pyatigorsk)
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8430-8501;
e-mail: olitvishko@yandex.ru
Yuliana A. Chernousova
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-6441-3950;
e-mail: ellemoi@rambler.ru
Olga I. Natkho
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-9638-7507;
e-mail: onatkho@mail.ru
References:
1. Golovanova EI. Professional discourse, subdiscourse, professional communicative genre: correlation of notions. CSU Bulletin. Series.: Philology, art history, 2013;1(292):32–35. (In Russ.).
2. Buzzword. Macmillan English Dictionary. Available at: https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/buzzword/. Accessed Nov 11, 2020.
3. Callary R. Specialists speak. New York, 2008. (In Eng.).
4. Novikov V. A new dictionary of buzzwords. М.: АST: Zebra Е; 2008. (In Russ.).
5. Zhuravleva NG. Phenomenon of “buzz” words: linguo-pragmatic aspect (on the material of modern Russian). Author’s abstract of the thesis. Stavropol, 2010:19. Available at: https://www.dissercat.com/content/fenomen-modnogo-slova-lingvopragmaticheskii-aspekt. Accessed Oct 16, 2020. (In Russ.).
6. Pol’skaya SS. Buzzwords: a part of professional language or unnecessary deadweight? Current problems of humanitarian and natural sciences, 2013;08 (55):304-307. (In Russ.).
7. Moleva NY., Gradaleva ЕА. Buzzwords: semantics and specifics of use in professional environment. Fundamental and applied research in the modern world, 2016;16-3:43-45. (In Russ.).
8. Diakonova SА. Lexical innovations in cross-cultural communicative practice: аnalysis of “buzz” neologisms in modern English. Comparative linguistics. 2017;6:99-103. (In Russ.).
9. Kilyeni A. Likes, tweets and other “friends”: social media buzzwords from a terminology perspective. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015;192:430-437. (In Eng.).
10. Cornwall A. Buzzwords and fuzzwords: deconstructing development discourse. Available at: https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/ 10546/118173/bk-deconstructing-development-buzzwords-010910-en.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y/. Accessed Oct 16, 2020.
11. Wei Z., Ying L. From neologisms to buzzwords – memetic explanation. Available at: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-CQGS201101019.htm/. Accessed Oct 16, 2020.
12. Wei-hong L. A Study of the top buzzwords in English from the perspective of sociolinguistics. Available at: https://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-ZZZA201402008.htm/. Accessed Oct 16, 2020.
13. Vinay J-P., Darbelnet J. Comparative Stylistics of French and English: A Methodology for Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1995. (In Eng.).
14. Revzin II., Rosenzweig YV. Basics of general and machine translation. Мoscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1964. (In Russ.).
15. Barkhudarov LS. Language and translation: problems of general and specific theory of translations. Мoscow: International relations, 1975. (In Russ.).
16. Muraviev VL. Problems of the emergence of ethnographic lexical gaps: a course in the typology of Russian and French. Vladimir: VGPI, 1980. (In Russ.).
17. Ivanova SV. Political media-discourse through linguo-cultural studies. Political linguistics. Ekaterinburg, 2008;1(24):29-33. (In Russ.).
18. Kuryleva LА., Nikiforova АS. Phenomenon of linguo-cultural lacunarity in political media-discourse. Language and culture, 2011;2(14):65-74. (In Russ.).
19. Spiridovskiy ОV., Rassolenko SV. Inter-lingual lexical gaps in political discourse (on the material of Russian and English). Philology Studies. Issues of theory and practice, 2019;10(12):324-328. (in Russ.).
20. Chervyakova LD. Teaching cross-cultural business communication: problems of lexical gaps in official business language. Bulletin of RUDN. Series: Russian and foreign languages and methods of teaching. 2003;1:68-72. (in Russ.).
21. Buzzwords by Macmillan Dictionary – new words in English. Available at: https://www.macmillandictionary.com/buzzword/. Accessed Oct 16, 2020.
22. The Global language monitor. Available at: https://languagemonitor.com/. Accessed Oct 16, 2020.
23. From woke to gammon: buzzwords by the people who coined them. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/dec/25/woke-to-gammon-buzzwords-by-people-coined-them/. Accessed Oct 16, 2020.
24. Zhou Li-na. Neologism in News English. Available at: http://www.davidpublisher.com/Public/uploads/Contribute/570f3d2ade3b9.pdf/. Accessed Oct 16, 2020.
25. Ushkova IV., Kireev EY. Transgender in modern Russian society. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/transgendernost-v-sovremennom-rossiyskom-obschestve/. Accessed Oct 16, 2020.
26. Astafurova TN., Sukhorukovа ОB. Structural-semantic and functional peculiarities of telescopic units in mass-information discourse (on the material of English-language press). Bulletin of VolGU. Series 2: Linguistics. Volgograd, 2005; 4:130-134. (In Russ.).