Abstract:
the paper discusses the use of irony in modern public diplomatic discourse. The aim of the study is to describe the functions of irony in diplomatic communication and to show how ironic comments affect communication at the international level. The research is based on the speeches by Russian diplomats and official representatives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, as well as their publications and comments in social networks. Diplomatic discourse is carried out on the basis of diplomatic protocol and, ideally, should follow the requirements of explicitness, argumentativeness, and minimal emotionality. At the same time, an important property of this sphere of communication is competitiveness (agonality), which is associated with defending the interests of the state on the international level and manifests itself in the explicit competition of various points of view. The study suggests that in modern diplomatic discourse, there are frequent cases of deviations from the diplomatic protocol, when speakers use irony as a way of expressing an implicit critical assessment. Irony accompanies explicit critical assessments of events or actions of diplomats of other states and, as a rule, appears where there is an aggravation of international relations. Tactics used by the speakers to create irony make it easy for the addressee to recognize it. Since the purpose of ironic comments is to show the inconsistency of the opponents’ position, irony allows the speaker not only to express critical assessment of their statements or actions, but also to demonstrate the superiority of the stated point of view on events. Alternatively, it can be a sign of disappointment due to a diplomatic loss. In the context of intercultural communication at the state level, irony violates not only the requirements of diplomatic protocol, but also the principle of politeness, so it can be viewed as an instrument of confrontational agonality, which does not imply a constructive dialogue.
Keywords: diplomacy, public diplomatic discourse, irony, discursive practice, confrontation, competitiveness, critical evaluation
For citation: Shilikhina K.M. Ironic Comments in the Public Discourse of Russian Diplomats. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics. 2021, no 3, pp. 75–86 (In Russ.)
Bionote:
Ksenia M. Shilikhina
Voronezh State University,
1 University sq., Voronezh, Russian Federation, 394018;
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-2478-7296;
Scopus Author ID: 57191382860;
Researcher ID: I-4066-2013
References:
1. Belyakov MV., Maksimenko OI. Communicative and emotive Characteristics of the Diplomatic Idiolect. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics. 2020; 1(2):368-383 (In Russ.).
2. Belyakov MV. The Language of Diplomats in Social Networks. Contemporary Issues in linguistics, translation Studies, Literary Studies, Lexicography, Methods of Teaching Foreign Languages. Proceedings of the International Conference. Moscow: MGOU, 2017: 47-50 (In Russ.).
3. Diplomatic Service. Ed. by A.V. Torkunov, A.N. Panov. Moscow: Aspect Press, 2017: 352 (In Russ.).
4. Manor I. The Russians are laughing! The Russians are Laughing! How Russian Diplomats Employ Humour in Online Public diplomacy. Global Society. 2021; 35(1): 61-83. DOI:10.1080/13600826.2020.1828299.
5. Belyakov MV. Irony in Diplomatic Speech. Proceedings of the National Society of Applied Linguistics. 2019; 4(28): 7-16 (In Russ.).
6. Belyakov MV. Quantitative and linguoaxiologic analysis of speeches in the UN Security Council (Russian Diplomatic Discourse). Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. 2020; 3: 221-237. (In Russ.). Available at: www.evestnik-mgou.ru. Accessed July 20, 2021.
7. Brassett J., Browning CS., Wedderburn A. Humorous States: IR, New Diplomacy and the Rise of Comedy in Global Politics. Global Society. 2021; 35(1): 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2020.1828302.
8. Chernobrov D. Strategic humour: Public diplomacy and comic framing of foreign policy issues. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2021. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/ 10.1177/136914812110 23958. Accessed June 20, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1177/13691481211023958
9. Karasik VI. Language images of being. Moscow: Pushkin State Russian Language Institute, 2020: 468 (In Russ.).
10. McConnell F., Moreau T., Dittmer J. Mimicking state diplomacy: The Legitimizing strategies of unofficial diplomacies. Geoforum. 2012; 43(4): 804-814.
11. Sharp P. Diplomatic Theory of International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009: 345.
12. Briefing of the Official Representative of the Ministry of International Affairs M. Zakharova, Moscow, July 9, 2021. (In Russ.). Available at: https://www.mid.ru/press_service/spokesman/briefings/-/asset_publisher/D2wHa WMCU6Od/content/id/4811091. Accessed June 20, 2021.
13. Karasik VI., Slyshkin GG. Modern Discourse Developmental Trends. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics. 2021; 1: 14-31 (In Russ.).
14. Shilikhina KM. “Twin” Genres: Mock Genres in Online Discourse. Communicative Studies. 2019; 6 (3): 810-826 (In Russ.).
15. Kashkin VB. Introduction in Discourse Theory. Moscow: Vostochnaja kniga. 2010: 152 (In Russ.).
16. Serracino-Inglot P. To joke or not to joke: a diplomatic dilemma in the age of Internet. Language and Diplomacy. Ed by J. Kurbalija and H. Slavik. Malta: DiploProjects, Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies, 2001: 21-37.
17. Sheigal EI., Deshevova VV. Agonality in Communication: The Structure of the Concept. Proceedings of Chelyabinsk State University. Series: Philology. Art Studies. 2009; 34 (172): 145-148 (In Russ.).
18. Briefing of the Official Representative of the Ministry of International Affairs M. Zakharova. Moscow, July 1, 2021. (In Russ.). Available at: https://www.mid.ru/press_service/spokesman/briefings/-/asset_publisher/D2wHa WMCU6Od/ content/id/4806019. Accessed June 20, 2021.
19. Briefing of the Official Representative of the Ministry of International Affairs M. Zakharova, Moscow, July 1, 2021. (In Russ.). Available at: https://www.mid.ru/press_service/spokesman/briefings/-/asset_publisher/D2wHa WMCU6Od/content/id/4781270. Accessed June 20, 2021.
20. Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the United Nations. Press release on accusations addressed to Russian instructors in the Central African Republic. (In Russ.). Available at: https://russiaun.ru/ru/news/car0207. Accessed June 20, 2021.
21. Lavrov SV. The Law, the Rights and the Rules. (In Russ.). Available at: https://russiaun.ru/ru/news/article_280621. Accessed June 20, 2021.
22. Briefing of the Official Representative of the Ministry of International Affairs M. Zakharova, Moscow, November 21, 2019. (In Russ.). Available at: https://www.mid.ru/web/guest/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_ publisher/cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/3908615. Accessed June 20, 2021.
23. M.V. Zakharova’s personal Facebook Account. (In Russ.). Available at: https://www.facebook.com/ maria.zakharova.167. Accessed June 20, 2021.
24. M.V. Zakharova’s personal Telegram Account. (In Russ.). Available at: t.me/MariaVladimirovnaZakharova/221. Accessed June 20, 2021.