Abstract:
The article discusses the pragmatic specificity of the cultural codes’ representatives in the literary text containing foreign language inclusions. Pragmatic approach in history and criticism of literature allows to identify the features of the decoding copyright process, their impact on the reader, as well as describe various language products and methods for coding literary communication as a whole. Ethnic identification, equated, including in person axiology, dictates the search for deep patterns in texts containing foreign language inclusions. The complex nature of such literary text is determined primarily by the fact that such text manifests assimilation aspects of the literary personality of cultural codes of other national affiliation. The consequence of the use of such lexical components is the actualization of markers of lingvoculture and deepening the pragmatic potential of the literary text. The relevance of the article is determined by the need to establish the status of cultural codes in the organization of the semantic space of literary text, in the transmission of cultural meanings, meaningful both in the individually-copyright picture of the world and in the functioning of the collective consciousness of the nation. The purpose of the article is to determine the pragmatic specificity of cultural codes in the literary text, influencing the receptive-interpretative activity of the reader, on the example of the implementation of foreign language inclusions as markers of cultural codes in the essay “Caucasian” (1841) and the fairy tale “Ashik-Kerib” (1837) by M.Yu. Lermontov. As a carrier of the world national painting, the author of the literary text, in the event of a certain literary plan, is able to use the means of two languages, and the individual-author’s picture of the world of such a literary personality is characterized by the dynamism determined by the representation of linguistic components, which also include foreign language inclusions (orequivalent vocabulary (realities, exotic, ethnographs)). The literary text, which presents other-speaking inclusions, specially reflects the historical, socio-political, cultural and ethical being of the ethnos, which ultimately determines the author’s desire to expand the aesthetic opportunities of cultural codes marked in a special way in such a text.
Keywords: cultural code, individually-author’s picture of the world, cultural senses, pragmatics, literary text, semantic space of literary text, foreign language inclusions
For citation: Kuznetsova Anna V. The Pragmatics of Cultural Codes in Literary Text. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics. 2021, no 3, pp. 233–242 (In Russ.)
Bionote:
Anna V. Kuznetsova
Southern Federal University,
105/42 Bolshaya Sadovaya Str., Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation, 344006;
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-3001-3377;
Researcher ID: B-3050-2017
References:
1. Krasnykh VV. Ethnopsycholinguistics and linguoculturology. М.; 2002. Available at: https://klex.ru/nl3 Accessed Аug. 15, 2021 (In Russ.).
2. Lermontov MYu. Collected works in 4 volumes. Vol. 4: Prose. Letters. М.; 1958. (In Russ.).
3. Avanesova GA., Kuptsova IA. Culture codes: understanding the essence, functional role in cultural practice. In the world of science and art: issues of philology, art history and cultural studies: Sat. articles on the materials of the XLVII international scientific and practical conference. April 15, 2015 Novosibirsk, 2015: 4 (47): 28-37. (In Russ.).
4. Kravchenko AV. Sign, meaning, knowledge. Essay on the cognitive philosophy of language. Irkutsk; 2001. Available at: https://knigogid.ru/books/369219-znak-znachenie-znanie-ocherk-kognitivnoy-filosofii-yazyka Accessed Аug. 14, 2021 (In Russ.).
5. Nikishova TP. Cultural codes. Cultural theory in questions and answers. Ed. N.B. Shebarshova. Orenburg, 2007: 105-108. Available at: http://www.orenport.ru/images/img/686/bogus.pdf Accessed Аug. 15, 2021 (In Russ.).
6. Tolstoy NI., Tolstaya SM. About the Dictionary “Slavic Antiquities”. Slavic Antiquities: Ethnolinguistic Dictionary. Ed. N.I. Tolstoy. In 5 vol. M., 1995. T. 1: 5-14. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20393736 (In Russ.).
7. Telia VN. Priority tasks and methodological problems of the study of the phraseological composition of the language in the system of culture. Phraseology in the context of culture: Sat. scientific. tr. Ed. V.N. Telii. M., 1999: 13-24. (In Russ.).
8. Krysin LP. Foreign words in modern Russian. М.; 1968. (In Russ.).
9. Leontiev AA. Foreign language inclusions in Russian speech. Questions of the Сulture of Ыpeech. 1966: 7: 60-68. (In Russ.).
10. Vlakhov S., Florin S. Untranslatable in translation. М.; 1986. Available at: https://superlinguist.ru/teoriia-i-praktika-perevoda-skachat-knigi-besplatn/vlakhov-s-florin-s-neper... Accessed Аug. 12, 2021 (In Russ.).
11. Rogova EN., Yanitskiy LS. Specifics of the author’s intention in V. Sorokin’s “Metel”. Siberian Philological Journal. 2019: 4: 168-179. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/69/14.
12. Bila M., Kacmarova A., Vankova I. The encounter of two cultural identities: The case of social deixis. Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2020: 2 (24): 344-365. DOI 10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-2-344-365
13. Smirnova AI. Semantics of National Space and the Problem of Ethnic Self-Identification in Anna Nerkaga’s story “Aniko of the Nogo family”. Philological Sciences-Scientific Essays оf Higher Education. 2020: 6: 2: 300-306. DOI: 10.20339/PhS.6-20.300.
14. Efremov V. Theater as a cultural code of the Russian language. Foreign Language Teaching: 2019: 4 (46): 401-408.
15. Salakhova AR., Sergeeva EV., Bogorodskiy VA. On Communicative Failures in Cross-Cultural Discourse. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics: 2020: 11 (SI): 430-438. DOI: 10.22055/RALS.2020.16343.
16. Kuchukova ZA., Berberov BA., Berberova LB. Jerome Salinger and Heinrich Boll: experience of transcultural creativity. Philological Sciences-Scientific Essays оf Higher Education. 2020: 6: 2: 280-291. DOI: 10.20339/PhS.6-20.280.
17. Shalyutin SM. Artificial Intelligence: Epistemological Aspect. М.; 1985. (In Russ.).
18. Silantyev IV. The poetics of motive. М.; 2004. Available at: https://rusneb.ru/catalog/000199_ 000009_002428699/Accessed Аug. 15, 2021 (In Russ.).
19. Karaulov YuN. Russian language and linguistic personality. М.; 2010. Available at: https://klex.ru/mzk Accessed Аug. 15, 2021 (In Russ.).