Abstract:
Language policy issues are inextricably linked with the socio-political vectors of development of a state. The significance of this problem field is actualised with a number of examples from modern history, when the "language issue" became a source of social tension, led to various kinds of conflicts, including interstate ones.
The article is devoted to the analytical study of the modern specifics of language policy in the CIS countries. Research attention is focused on nine states that are active members of the integration association (Ukraine, which de facto does not participate in the activities of the Commonwealth, and Russia are not considered due to the presence of administrative national autonomies and the number of different ethno-cultural communities, as well as the need to reflect in the work the peculiarities of the functioning of the Russian language, which has a special status in the region).
The practice of implementing the language policy pursued in the CIS countries allows to generalize and compare the experience of states that have relatively recently received sovereignty and the ability to form an appropriate agenda independently.
The analysis made it possible to identify the general directions of language policy, typical for individual countries: 1) protection of the languages of the titular nation with the consolidation of their status as the only state and official for all spheres of communicative interaction (Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia, Uzbekistan); 2) carrying out an alphabetical reform in order to switch to the Latin alphabet (Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Uzbekistan); 3) implementation of the policy of state bi- or polylingualism (Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan); 4) attempts to solve precedent linguistic problems (nomination of the state language for Moldova, the status of the Russian language for Armenia and Georgia).
Keywords: language policy, CIS, the Russian language, state language, national language, official language, language planning
For citation: Lavitski A.A. Language Policy of the CIS Countries: Current State and Prospects. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics. 2021, no 4, pp. 16–27 (In Russ.)
Bionote:
Anton A. Lavitski
Belarussian State M. Tank Pedagogical University,
18 Soviet Str., Minsk, the Republic of Belarus, 220050;
International University «MITSO»,
8A M. Shagall Str., Vitebsk, the Republic of Belarus, 210010;
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-9102-4440
References:
1. Bakhtikireeva UM. On the question of the role of language in national conflicts. Language policy and language conflicts in the modern world. Eds. A.N. Bitkeeva, V.Yu. Mikhalchenko, 2014: 241–245. (In Russ.).
2. Kostyuk ME. State language policy of Russia: problems of formation and prospects for implementation. Bulletin of the Russian nation, 2010;4–5(12–13):224–237. (In Russ.).
3. Spolsky B. Language management. Cambridge; 2019. (In Eng.).
4. Bachneanu CV. La convergence et la politique linguistique. Social linguistics in Russian Federation (1992–1998), 1998:61–62. (In Fr.).
5. Zolyan ST., Akopyan KS. Russian language in Armenia: history and modern status. Tenth Annual Scientific Conference. Collection of scientific articles: Social sciences and humanities. Part III, 2016: 373–382. (In Russ.).
6. Shaklein VM. Russian language in the context of modern intercultural communication. Scientific notes of the V.I. Vernadsky Tavrichesky National University, 2002;15(54):17–21. (In Russ.).
7. Index of the position of the Russian language in the world: the index of global competitiveness (GC-Index), the index of sustainability in the countries of the post-Soviet space (S-Index). Compiled by A.L. Arefiev, D.A. Gorbatova, V.A. Zhiltsov, S.Yu. Kamysheva, E.V. Koltakova, I.A. Maev, M.A. Osadchiy, M.N. Rusetskaya, A.S. Hekhtel, M.I. Yaskevich, ed. M.A. Despondent. Moskow; 2020. (In Russ.).
8. Gottlieb N., Chen Р. Language planning and language policy: East Asian perspectives. Curzon; 2001. (In Eng.).
9. Baumann R., Briggs CL. Voices of Modernity: Language ideology and the politics of inequality. Cambridge; 2003. (In Eng.).
10. Kraus PA. Europäische Öffentlichkeit und Sprachpolitik. Frankfurt am Main; 2004. (In Ger).
11. Gulinov DYu. Language policy: definition and characteristics. Bulletin of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University. Series of Philological Sciences, 2011;5(59): 7–11. (In Russ.).
12. Schweitzer AD., Nikolsky LB. Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Moscow; 1978. (In Russ.).
13. Belikov VI., Krysin LP. Sociolinguistics. Moscow; 2001. (In Russ.).
14. Tumanyan EG. On the distinction between spontaneous and socially determined in the development of language. The influence of social factors on the functioning and development of language, 1988:118–123. (In Russ.).
15. Elistratov VS. On the content of the term "language policy" at the beginning of the XXI century. The Bulletin of Lomonosov Moscow State University Center for International Education, 2009;2:86–90. (In Russ.).
16. Arutyunova MA. Language policy and the status of the Russian language in the USSR and the states of the post-Soviet space. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 25. International relations and world politics, 2012,1:155-178. (In Russ.).
17. Zolyan ST. The Russian language in Armenia in the context of its functioning in the world: The experience of interdisciplinary research. Part I: Legal instruments for development and protection. Yerevan, 2018. (In Russ.).
18. Khudorenko EA. Language policy of Russia in the context of Eurasian integration. Political Science, 2020;2:163–182. (In Russ.).
19. Fadeev VV. Language policy and culture of the world. Forestry Bulletin, 2001; 3: 9-10. (In Russ.).
20. Mechkovskaya NB. Post-Soviet languages in the context of state sovereignty and the flourishing of information technologies. Bulletin of the Belarusian State University. Series 4, 2011;2:75–82. (In Russ.).
21. Seidumanova AS. Features of the formation of ethnopolitical models in the post-Soviet space. Bulletin of the Ural Federal University. Series 3: Social Sciences, 2019;14.2(188):85–93. (In Russ.).
22. Maslova VA., Danich OV. Spiritual energy of the Russian word as a problem of humanitarian thought. Russistics, 2021;19.2:125–137. (In Russ.).
23. Derbisheva Z. The ACTR Nationwide Survey of Russian High School Enrollments in 2009. Russian Language Journal, 2009;59:49–58. (In Eng.).
24. Zharkynbekova ShK. Language reforms and intercultural transformations in the multilingual space of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Educational issues: languages and specialties, 2017;14.2:246–252.
25. Winter MG. On the problem of introducing trilingualism in the educational process of universities in Kazakhstan. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University, 2018;4(414):78–88.
26. Bublikov VV. Assimilation or multiculturalism is the experience of foreign countries in the integration of immigrants. Bulletin of Tomsk State University, 2008;315:38–41.
27. Asadov ZV. Language policy of Azerbaijan. The place of the Russian lan-guage in the education system of the republic. Russian language abroad, 2011;4:97–100.
28. Serio P. What is behind the name of the Moldavian language? Political Linguistics, 2021;2(86):33–56.
29. Popova EV. Functioning of the Russian language in Georgia after the collapse of the USSR. Post-Soviet continent, 2016;1:35–47.